{"generated_at":"2026-10-22T07:18:47.219Z","license":"CC BY 4.0","license_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","citation_format":"Who Killed the Building?, [case name], whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/[slug], accessed [date]","count":104,"decisions":[{"id":"92e8010f-643b-4ff3-940f-8c08b794c378","project_slug":"cupertino-vallco-2015","project_name":"Vallco Town Center / The Rise","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/cupertino-vallco-2015","jurisdiction_slug":"cupertino-santa-clara","city":"Cupertino","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2018-09-21","body":"Staff","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"none","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.cupertino.gov/Your-City/Departments/Community-Development/Planning/Major-Projects/The-Rise-Vallco-SB35-Application","source_label":"City of Cupertino","notes":"Original SB 35 approval of the Vallco Town Center application (2,402 units).","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:50:10.167267"},{"id":"37c6a1ba-d122-40fd-984f-5196884751d8","project_slug":"brisbane-baylands-2005","project_name":"Brisbane Baylands Specific Plan","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/brisbane-baylands-2005","jurisdiction_slug":"brisbane-san-mateo","city":"Brisbane","county":"San Mateo","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2018-11-06","body":"Voters","action":"referendum_passed","action_label":"referendum passed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/brisbane-baylands-development-proposal-passes/article_9053e892-e2f1-11e8-8014-7fe19c621e72.html","source_label":"San Mateo Daily Journal","notes":"Measure JJ, a general plan amendment allowing 1,800 to 2,200 homes on the Baylands, passed with about 55 percent.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:21:04.658802"},{"id":"fce21512-74c6-4bd1-b168-76e1eeacde39","project_slug":"los-altos-40-main-2018","project_name":"40 Main Street Apartments (SB 35)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-altos-40-main-2018","jurisdiction_slug":"los-altos-santa-clara","city":"Los Altos","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2019-04-09","body":"City Council","action":"appeal_rejected","action_label":"appeal rejected","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.mv-voice.com/news/2019/07/28/housing-advocates-file-suit-against-los-altos-for-blocking-project/","source_label":"Mountain View Voice","notes":"Upheld the staff denial of SB 35 streamlining; Resolution 2019-13 was adopted April 23, 2019.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:17:17.68395"},{"id":"8bbd6228-7829-4a10-9a0c-32cb8bfc950a","project_slug":"los-angeles-806-west-adams-2019","project_name":"806 West Adams Boulevard Apartments (University Park)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-angeles-806-west-adams-2019","jurisdiction_slug":"los-angeles-los-angeles","city":"Los Angeles","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2019-05-17","body":"Staff","action":"denied","action_label":"denied","staff_recommendation":"none","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/B319121.PDF","source_label":"Court of Appeal","notes":"Zoning administrator granted a Class 32 exemption but denied site plan review over rooftop deck noise.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:32:38.983944"},{"id":"9f552c55-235a-4588-975f-947b3dc731ba","project_slug":"los-altos-40-main-2018","project_name":"40 Main Street Apartments (SB 35)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-altos-40-main-2018","jurisdiction_slug":"los-altos-santa-clara","city":"Los Altos","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2019-06-12","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.mv-voice.com/news/2019/07/28/housing-advocates-file-suit-against-los-altos-for-blocking-project/","source_label":"Mountain View Voice","notes":"CaRLA sued in Santa Clara County Superior Court; the case was consolidated with the owners' suit.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:17:17.68395"},{"id":"90100c57-5871-4444-a91e-e234d0f5d84d","project_slug":"los-angeles-806-west-adams-2019","project_name":"806 West Adams Boulevard Apartments (University Park)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-angeles-806-west-adams-2019","jurisdiction_slug":"los-angeles-los-angeles","city":"Los Angeles","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2019-10-10","body":"Planning Commission","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/B319121.PDF","source_label":"Court of Appeal","notes":"Approved the redesigned project and denied an appeal, with limits on deck hours.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:32:38.983944"},{"id":"8d077e11-4db4-4cce-9eb5-93daf38fc767","project_slug":"los-angeles-806-west-adams-2019","project_name":"806 West Adams Boulevard Apartments (University Park)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-angeles-806-west-adams-2019","jurisdiction_slug":"los-angeles-los-angeles","city":"Los Angeles","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2020-02-04","body":"City Council","action":"appeal_rejected","action_label":"appeal rejected","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/B319121.PDF","source_label":"Court of Appeal","notes":"Denied an appeal and upheld the CEQA exemption.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:32:38.983944"},{"id":"f91f6b06-16eb-46a8-9724-dbfe77b16342","project_slug":"los-altos-40-main-2018","project_name":"40 Main Street Apartments (SB 35)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-altos-40-main-2018","jurisdiction_slug":"los-altos-santa-clara","city":"Los Altos","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2020-04-24","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.hklaw.com/en/news/pressreleases/2020/05/holland-knight-first-in-california-to-win-lawsuit-new-housing-law","source_label":"Holland & Knight","notes":"Ruled that the city violated SB 35, the Density Bonus Law and the Housing Accountability Act and ordered it to issue permits.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:17:17.68395"},{"id":"8f04d0f7-d912-456b-9bbe-787a13be4d0c","project_slug":"los-altos-40-main-2018","project_name":"40 Main Street Apartments (SB 35)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-altos-40-main-2018","jurisdiction_slug":"los-altos-santa-clara","city":"Los Altos","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2020-07-08","body":"City Council","action":"appeal_filed","action_label":"appeal filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://losaltosca.gov/citycouncil/page/los-altos-city-council-appeal-court-ruling-40-main-street-case","source_label":"City of Los Altos","notes":"Voted to appeal the trial court ruling. The appeal was dropped in September 2020.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:17:17.68395"},{"id":"c454c5ba-53c8-4d6f-8792-13fa9539cf31","project_slug":"los-altos-40-main-2018","project_name":"40 Main Street Apartments (SB 35)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-altos-40-main-2018","jurisdiction_slug":"los-altos-santa-clara","city":"Los Altos","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2020-09-10","body":"City Council","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.hklaw.com/en/news/pressreleases/2020/09/holland-knight-first-in-california-to-secure-housing-approval-through","source_label":"Holland & Knight","notes":"Dropped the appeal and voted to issue the permit; Resolution 2020-33 rescinding the denial followed on Sept. 22, 2020.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:17:17.68395"},{"id":"d9242a14-0d53-4c38-98e0-1d7b91817932","project_slug":"livermore-eden-housing-2022","project_name":"Downtown Livermore Apartments (Eden Housing)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/livermore-eden-housing-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"livermore-alameda","city":"Livermore","county":"Alameda","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2021-05-25","body":"City Council","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":5,"vote_against":0,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.pleasantonweekly.com/news/2021/05/25/livermore-council-approves-affordable-housing-development-in-downtown","source_label":"Pleasanton Weekly","notes":"Unanimous approval of the 130-unit project after a hearing that began May 24, 2021, with findings under the density bonus law, CEQA and the Housing Accountability Act.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:27:06.481007"},{"id":"beea6bf4-b1e9-4e19-a2c3-c681bd6a40f7","project_slug":"berkeley-1900-fourth-2018","project_name":"1900 Fourth Street Mixed-Use Apartments","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/berkeley-1900-fourth-2018","jurisdiction_slug":"berkeley-alameda","city":"Berkeley","county":"Alameda","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2021-07-28","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.berkeleyside.org/2021/07/29/development-spengers-parking-lot-can-proceed-ohlone-shellmound-ruling","source_label":"Berkeleyside","notes":"The California Supreme Court declined to review the Court of Appeal decision in Ruegg & Ellsworth v. City of Berkeley.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:36:34.46143"},{"id":"c6a21881-a0b2-4ce0-92f9-d70341746a45","project_slug":"livermore-eden-housing-2022","project_name":"Downtown Livermore Apartments (Eden Housing)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/livermore-eden-housing-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"livermore-alameda","city":"Livermore","county":"Alameda","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2022-02-04","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.pleasantonweekly.com/news/2022/03/01/livermore-both-sides-react-to-recent-ruling-in-eden-housing-lawsuit/","source_label":"Pleasanton Weekly","notes":"Judge Frank Roesch denied Save Livermore Downtown's petition in Alameda County Superior Court.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:27:06.481007"},{"id":"7614a099-fb46-42f9-a7bb-d25df604114c","project_slug":"elk-grove-oak-rose-2022","project_name":"Oak Rose Apartments — Old Town Elk Grove","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/elk-grove-oak-rose-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"elk-grove-sacramento","city":"Elk Grove","county":"Sacramento","region":"Sacramento","decision_date":"2022-06-02","body":"Planning Commission","action":"denied","action_label":"denied","staff_recommendation":"deny","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.hcd.ca.gov/sites/default/files/docs/planning-and-community/HAU/elk-grove-NOV-101222.pdf","source_label":"HCD notice of violation","notes":"Resolution No. 2022-19 denied the SB 35 application.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:31:31.137578"},{"id":"0dfbae9e-d4e3-4a92-b43c-3263a570082f","project_slug":"elk-grove-oak-rose-2022","project_name":"Oak Rose Apartments — Old Town Elk Grove","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/elk-grove-oak-rose-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"elk-grove-sacramento","city":"Elk Grove","county":"Sacramento","region":"Sacramento","decision_date":"2022-07-27","body":"City Council","action":"appeal_rejected","action_label":"appeal rejected","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bonta-newsom-administration-file-lawsuit-challenging-elk-grove","source_label":"California Attorney General","notes":"The council denied the developer's appeal, citing the Old Town ground-floor use restriction.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:31:31.137578"},{"id":"ec523d61-0cb3-4f9e-b6b7-e77e479df9b5","project_slug":"redondo-beach-ten21-2022","project_name":"Ten21 Harbor (Former SEA Lab Site, 1021 N. Harbor Drive)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/redondo-beach-ten21-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"redondo-beach-los-angeles","city":"Redondo Beach","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2022-12-07","body":"Staff","action":"deemed_incomplete","action_label":"deemed application incomplete","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.coxcastle.com/assets/htmldocuments/New%20Commune%20DTLA%20v.%20Redondo%20Beach%20CA_SUP_LAX_23STCP00426_Order%20002.pdf","source_label":"Superior Court ruling","notes":"The community development director rejected the formal application as incomplete and declined to process it.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:10:29.550153"},{"id":"d19478f8-840e-4034-a349-92f73b7c2c65","project_slug":"livermore-eden-housing-2022","project_name":"Downtown Livermore Apartments (Eden Housing)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/livermore-eden-housing-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"livermore-alameda","city":"Livermore","county":"Alameda","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2022-12-28","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.independentnews.com/news/livermore_news/california-s-first-district-court-of-appeal-rejects-save-livermore-downtowns-appeal-of-design-and/article_3eaa145c-8c4e-11ed-b64c-f3a018c79472.html","source_label":"The Independent","notes":"First District Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of Save Livermore Downtown's petition and upheld the $500,000 bond (A164987).","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:27:06.481007"},{"id":"a566e1aa-8947-456d-a204-c1a351171e8f","project_slug":"redondo-beach-ten21-2022","project_name":"Ten21 Harbor (Former SEA Lab Site, 1021 N. Harbor Drive)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/redondo-beach-ten21-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"redondo-beach-los-angeles","city":"Redondo Beach","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2023-02-07","body":"City Council","action":"appeal_rejected","action_label":"appeal rejected","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.coxcastle.com/assets/htmldocuments/New%20Commune%20DTLA%20v.%20Redondo%20Beach%20CA_SUP_LAX_23STCP00426_Order%20002.pdf","source_label":"Superior Court ruling","notes":"Unanimously adopted Resolution CC-2302-023 upholding the director's rejection; the tally was not reported.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:10:29.550153"},{"id":"c3682ffd-08f3-4910-a819-e83eaef23ba9","project_slug":"redondo-beach-ten21-2022","project_name":"Ten21 Harbor (Former SEA Lab Site, 1021 N. Harbor Drive)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/redondo-beach-ten21-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"redondo-beach-los-angeles","city":"Redondo Beach","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2023-02-14","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.coxcastle.com/assets/htmldocuments/New%20Commune%20DTLA%20v.%20Redondo%20Beach%20CA_SUP_LAX_23STCP00426_Order%20002.pdf","source_label":"Superior Court ruling","notes":"New Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach, Los Angeles County Superior Court case 23STCP00426.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:10:29.550153"},{"id":"9a2e6322-2262-4c4c-a008-2988eb471077","project_slug":"berkeley-peoples-park-2021","project_name":"People's Park Student and Supportive Housing","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/berkeley-peoples-park-2021","jurisdiction_slug":"berkeley-alameda","city":"Berkeley","county":"Alameda","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2023-02-24","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/A165451.PDF","source_label":"Court of Appeal","notes":"The Court of Appeal voided the EIR, requiring analysis of noise from student parties and of alternative sites.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:31:16.702757"},{"id":"0dd1423f-ee5d-4ef4-a210-57917f006eb5","project_slug":"fairfax-marinda-heights-2023","project_name":"Marinda Heights Builder's Remedy Subdivision (Wall Property)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/fairfax-marinda-heights-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"fairfax-marin","city":"Fairfax","county":"Marin","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2023-03-13","body":"Staff","action":"deemed_incomplete","action_label":"deemed application incomplete","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.northbaybusinessjournal.com/article/article/mill-valley-developer-seeks-builders-remedy-project-in-fairfax/","source_label":"North Bay Business Journal","notes":"The town attorney wrote that the SB 330 preliminary application would be deemed submitted only after the town received a $50,000 deposit and a signed reimbursement and indemnity agreement.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:23:09.355251"},{"id":"d03bb2a8-6a18-445e-a6be-791f34d2a0d1","project_slug":"huntington-beach-housing-element-2021","project_name":"Huntington Beach 6th Cycle Housing Program — 13,368 Units","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/huntington-beach-housing-element-2021","jurisdiction_slug":"huntington-beach-orange","city":"Huntington Beach","county":"Orange","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2023-04-04","body":"City Council","action":"denied","action_label":"denied","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":4,"vote_against":3,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://therealdeal.com/la/2023/04/06/destroying-our-city-huntington-beach-rejects-state-housing-plan/","source_label":"The Real Deal","notes":"Voted against adopting the housing element prepared by city staff.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:42:59.673711"},{"id":"23f7a987-2666-4695-806b-ae8495c2ea21","project_slug":"livermore-eden-housing-2022","project_name":"Downtown Livermore Apartments (Eden Housing)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/livermore-eden-housing-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"livermore-alameda","city":"Livermore","county":"Alameda","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2023-04-19","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.allenmatkins.com/real-ideas/california-supreme-court-denies-petition-for-review-of-save-livermore-downtown-v-city-of-livermore.html","source_label":"Allen Matkins","notes":"California Supreme Court denied Save Livermore Downtown's petition for review.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:27:06.481007"},{"id":"fff255a1-3a83-4c12-a09c-621d5b400ee8","project_slug":"elk-grove-oak-rose-2022","project_name":"Oak Rose Apartments — Old Town Elk Grove","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/elk-grove-oak-rose-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"elk-grove-sacramento","city":"Elk Grove","county":"Sacramento","region":"Sacramento","decision_date":"2023-05-01","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bonta-newsom-administration-file-lawsuit-challenging-elk-grove","source_label":"California Attorney General","notes":"The Attorney General, Governor and HCD sued the city in Sacramento County Superior Court.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:31:31.137578"},{"id":"eccec9eb-4f9f-436c-9312-e29b8be22864","project_slug":"la-canada-foothill-2022","project_name":"600 Foothill Boulevard Mixed-Use","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/la-canada-foothill-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"la-canada-flintridge-los-angeles","city":"La Cañada Flintridge","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2023-05-01","body":"City Council","action":"denied","action_label":"denied","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://lcf.ca.gov/lcfhousingpolicy-legalmatters/","source_label":"City of La Cañada Flintridge","notes":"Determined that the builder's remedy was not available for the project.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:43:43.644978"},{"id":"74a2b408-93b1-4e8c-896c-2d5dc283a8ec","project_slug":"los-angeles-806-west-adams-2019","project_name":"806 West Adams Boulevard Apartments (University Park)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-angeles-806-west-adams-2019","jurisdiction_slug":"los-angeles-los-angeles","city":"Los Angeles","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2023-08-10","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/B319121.PDF","source_label":"Court of Appeal","notes":"Unpublished opinion setting aside the CEQA exemption.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:32:38.983944"},{"id":"e3738af6-d4ca-4630-ac51-6477d9bca5b6","project_slug":"redondo-beach-one-redondo-2022","project_name":"One Redondo — AES Power Plant Waterfront Redevelopment","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/redondo-beach-one-redondo-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"redondo-beach-los-angeles","city":"Redondo Beach","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2023-10-30","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.coxcastle.com/assets/htmldocuments/New%20Commune%20DTLA%20v.%20Redondo%20Beach%20CA_SUP_LAX_23STCP00426_Order%20002.pdf","source_label":"Court filing","notes":"Judge Ronald Frank denied New Commune DTLA's housing element petition (22TRCP00203), finding the element compliant from its July 5, 2022 adoption.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:29:19.126864"},{"id":"39d8fcf2-9069-4a9e-8bc8-8f5589a9bd7b","project_slug":"huntington-beach-housing-element-2021","project_name":"Huntington Beach 6th Cycle Housing Program — 13,368 Units","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/huntington-beach-housing-element-2021","jurisdiction_slug":"huntington-beach-orange","city":"Huntington Beach","county":"Orange","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2023-11-13","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.courthousenews.com/huntington-beach-loses-effort-to-dodge-california-housing-requirements/","source_label":"Courthouse News","notes":"U.S. District Court dismissed the city's federal lawsuit with prejudice for lack of standing.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:42:59.673711"},{"id":"33bbf3ee-092e-45e4-b086-3fa3a3598e56","project_slug":"danville-anderson-ranch-2023","project_name":"Anderson Ranch Builder's Remedy Subdivision","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/danville-anderson-ranch-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"danville-contra-costa","city":"Danville","county":"Contra Costa","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2024-01-19","body":"Staff","action":"deemed_incomplete","action_label":"deemed application incomplete","staff_recommendation":"none","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://danville-ca.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=9&clip_id=3303&meta_id=59419","source_label":"Town of Danville","notes":"First incompleteness letter, listing eight deficiencies.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:22:12.451728"},{"id":"f124269b-87c3-4aa0-9ea8-c7031f34f6fe","project_slug":"redondo-beach-ten21-2022","project_name":"Ten21 Harbor (Former SEA Lab Site, 1021 N. Harbor Drive)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/redondo-beach-ten21-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"redondo-beach-los-angeles","city":"Redondo Beach","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2024-02-08","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://easyreadernews.com/judge-rules-against-pustilnikov-for-s-e-a-lab-project","source_label":"Easy Reader","notes":"Judge James C. Chalfant denied the petition, holding that the project had to conform to the certified local coastal program.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:10:29.550153"},{"id":"da040306-ff0c-41b0-8dc4-f220a8603205","project_slug":"cupertino-vallco-2015","project_name":"Vallco Town Center / The Rise","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/cupertino-vallco-2015","jurisdiction_slug":"cupertino-santa-clara","city":"Cupertino","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2024-02-16","body":"Staff","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"none","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.cupertino.gov/Your-City/Departments/Community-Development/Planning/Major-Projects/The-Rise-Vallco-SB35-Application","source_label":"City of Cupertino","notes":"Approved the second modification: 2,669 units, 890 affordable.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:50:10.167267"},{"id":"7695fdd2-5c7d-4f0b-a49d-21eae2e48c41","project_slug":"la-canada-foothill-2022","project_name":"600 Foothill Boulevard Mixed-Use","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/la-canada-foothill-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"la-canada-flintridge-los-angeles","city":"La Cañada Flintridge","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2024-03-04","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://lcf.ca.gov/lcfhousingpolicy-legalmatters/","source_label":"City of La Cañada Flintridge","notes":"Found that the builder's remedy applies and required CEQA compliance; rejected the bad-faith claim.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:43:43.644978"},{"id":"74644485-1694-4265-8eda-3bffbd7ed21f","project_slug":"livermore-eden-housing-2022","project_name":"Downtown Livermore Apartments (Eden Housing)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/livermore-eden-housing-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"livermore-alameda","city":"Livermore","county":"Alameda","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2024-03-06","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ca-court-of-appeal/115938171.html","source_label":"Court of Appeal opinion","notes":"Move Eden Housing v. City of Livermore (A167346): the city must process the referendum petition; the $500,000 undertaking order was reversed.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:27:06.481007"},{"id":"abbd9f3f-6acd-4a81-ac7b-5209b85d6d15","project_slug":"santa-clara-county-almaden-woodcliff-2023","project_name":"Almaden Road and Woodcliff Court Builder's Remedy Subdivisions","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/santa-clara-county-almaden-woodcliff-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"unincorporated-santa-clara-county-south-san-jose-area-santa-clara","city":"Unincorporated Santa Clara County (South San Jose area)","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2024-05-03","body":"Staff","action":"deemed_incomplete","action_label":"deemed application incomplete","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://stgenpln.blob.core.windows.net/document/PLN24_063_SB330_Letter_Incomplete_response.pdf","source_label":"County of Santa Clara","notes":"Almaden Road application PLN24-063-SB330.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:13:06.42699"},{"id":"b92b1313-55b2-43ed-aad9-c06f537c8787","project_slug":"danville-anderson-ranch-2023","project_name":"Anderson Ranch Builder's Remedy Subdivision","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/danville-anderson-ranch-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"danville-contra-costa","city":"Danville","county":"Contra Costa","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2024-05-16","body":"Staff","action":"deemed_incomplete","action_label":"deemed application incomplete","staff_recommendation":"none","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://danville-ca.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=9&clip_id=3303&meta_id=59419","source_label":"Town of Danville","notes":"Second incompleteness letter, citing access and utility easements and a landslide repair plan.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:22:12.451728"},{"id":"f95a9ff3-37ea-4dc4-b742-d9e7bf68190a","project_slug":"berkeley-peoples-park-2021","project_name":"People's Park Student and Supportive Housing","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/berkeley-peoples-park-2021","jurisdiction_slug":"berkeley-alameda","city":"Berkeley","county":"Alameda","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2024-06-06","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":7,"vote_against":0,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/S279242.PDF","source_label":"California Supreme Court","notes":"The California Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:31:16.702757"},{"id":"b0c06cd2-c9af-4da1-a7da-2221ddb8cc8b","project_slug":"danville-anderson-ranch-2023","project_name":"Anderson Ranch Builder's Remedy Subdivision","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/danville-anderson-ranch-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"danville-contra-costa","city":"Danville","county":"Contra Costa","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2024-06-18","body":"City Council","action":"appeal_rejected","action_label":"appeal rejected","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":5,"vote_against":0,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://danville-ca.granicus.com/DocumentViewer.php?file=danville-ca_8895f054283b39e002f0602900497047.pdf&view=1","source_label":"Town of Danville","notes":"Denied the applicant's appeal of the incompleteness determination (Resolution 44-2024).","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:22:12.451728"},{"id":"945760c2-8352-409b-bb37-8b82118f35d9","project_slug":"livermore-eden-housing-2022","project_name":"Downtown Livermore Apartments (Eden Housing)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/livermore-eden-housing-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"livermore-alameda","city":"Livermore","county":"Alameda","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2024-06-24","body":"City Council","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.pleasantonweekly.com/city-politics/2025/07/30/ratify-reaffirm-readopt-livermore-council-again-endorses-eden-housing-project-provisions/","source_label":"Pleasanton Weekly","notes":"Accepted the referendum petition's certification, repealed the 2022 resolution and readopted the agreement without the Veterans Park work.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:27:06.481007"},{"id":"1c7ffbe7-ffc4-4c2c-a578-828f2c6fb678","project_slug":"beverly-hills-linden-2022","project_name":"125-129 S. Linden Drive Mixed-Use Tower (Beverly Hills)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/beverly-hills-linden-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"beverly-hills-los-angeles","city":"Beverly Hills","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2024-06-27","body":"City Council","action":"appeal_rejected","action_label":"appeal rejected","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":5,"vote_against":0,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://la.urbanize.city/post/beverly-hills-blocks-19-story-builders-remedy-development","source_label":"Urbanize LA","notes":"Denied the developer's appeal of the October 2023 incompleteness determination.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:38:25.607413"},{"id":"377a9c31-fd6e-40fc-81c5-2cf5321a5227","project_slug":"newport-beach-housing-element-2024","project_name":"Newport Beach Housing Plan and Measure H","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/newport-beach-housing-element-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"newport-beach-orange","city":"Newport Beach","county":"Orange","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2024-08-08","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/SPON%20Brief.pdf","source_label":"Court filing","notes":"Still Protecting Our Newport v. City of Newport Beach (Charter Section 423).","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:24:52.59738"},{"id":"b3d13f8f-4fef-4058-b17a-94a927f6d654","project_slug":"santa-barbara-505-los-olivos-2024","project_name":"505 East Los Olivos Street (Behind the Old Mission)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/santa-barbara-505-los-olivos-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"santa-barbara-santa-barbara","city":"Santa Barbara","county":"Santa Barbara","region":"Central Coast","decision_date":"2024-08-20","body":"Staff","action":"deemed_incomplete","action_label":"deemed application incomplete","staff_recommendation":"none","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.santabarbara.courts.ca.gov/tentative-ruling/25cv03180-0","source_label":"Santa Barbara Superior Court","notes":"First of four incompleteness findings (August 2024 to May 2025).","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:30:03.863987"},{"id":"db497e6c-69b3-4077-8b67-f3d6a006073f","project_slug":"cupertino-scofield-vista-heights-2024","project_name":"Scofield Drive and Vista Heights Builder's Remedy Projects","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/cupertino-scofield-vista-heights-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"cupertino-santa-clara","city":"Cupertino","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2024-09-13","body":"Staff","action":"deemed_incomplete","action_label":"deemed application incomplete","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.hcd.ca.gov/sites/default/files/docs/planning-and-community/HAU/cupertino-hau-1585-psa-90-days-nov-071625.pdf","source_label":"HCD","notes":"Both full applications were found incomplete, on Sept. 13 and 16, 2024.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:21:52.364441"},{"id":"0d20af75-8e4a-4582-8c68-53d52c31c46d","project_slug":"newport-beach-housing-element-2024","project_name":"Newport Beach Housing Plan and Measure H","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/newport-beach-housing-element-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"newport-beach-orange","city":"Newport Beach","county":"Orange","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2024-09-24","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/NBSA%20Brief.pdf","source_label":"Court filing","notes":"Newport Beach Stewardship Association v. City of Newport Beach.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:24:52.59738"},{"id":"1121284c-2476-4fbf-80fa-64c78a5d0000","project_slug":"huntington-beach-housing-element-2021","project_name":"Huntington Beach 6th Cycle Housing Program — 13,368 Units","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/huntington-beach-housing-element-2021","jurisdiction_slug":"huntington-beach-orange","city":"Huntington Beach","county":"Orange","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2024-10-30","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":3,"vote_against":0,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.gov.ca.gov/2024/10/30/california-claims-victory-against-huntington-beachs-nimby-attempt-to-challenge-state-housing-law/","source_label":"CA Governor","notes":"A Ninth Circuit panel unanimously affirmed the dismissal of the federal lawsuit.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:42:59.673711"},{"id":"13088af7-bfeb-4ad4-8a28-77d998c56d86","project_slug":"los-angeles-806-west-adams-2019","project_name":"806 West Adams Boulevard Apartments (University Park)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-angeles-806-west-adams-2019","jurisdiction_slug":"los-angeles-los-angeles","city":"Los Angeles","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2024-10-31","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/B319121.PDF","source_label":"Court of Appeal","notes":"Published opinion: occupant noise no longer counts, but the exemption stays set aside pending a redevelopment plan consistency finding.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:32:38.983944"},{"id":"20bc95a6-3a47-48d5-9cd7-abcbca262ac6","project_slug":"norwalk-shelter-ban-2024","project_name":"Norwalk Ban on Shelters and Supportive Housing","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/norwalk-shelter-ban-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"norwalk-los-angeles","city":"Norwalk","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2024-11-04","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.thedowneypatriot.com/articles/state-sues-norwalk-over-housing-policies","source_label":"The Downey Patriot","notes":"People ex rel. Bonta and HCD v. City of Norwalk (24STCP03551), Los Angeles County Superior Court.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:33:51.309969"},{"id":"fbc01b35-0b1f-4b80-8fd1-5b0e06fc1593","project_slug":"los-gatos-arya-luxe-2023","project_name":"The Arya and The Luxe: Los Gatos Boulevard Builder's Remedy Projects","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-gatos-arya-luxe-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"los-gatos-santa-clara","city":"Los Gatos","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2024-12-23","body":"Staff","action":"deemed_incomplete","action_label":"deemed application incomplete","staff_recommendation":"none","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://mccmeetings.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/losgatos-pubu/MEET-Packet-3423e578564544c4b346a056e5fd6d16.pdf","source_label":"Town of Los Gatos","notes":"Third incompleteness determination for The Arya; The Luxe's third came Nov. 20, 2024.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:19:45.389007"},{"id":"26e51207-f25f-480a-8c40-245afa85695f","project_slug":"solvang-wildwood-2023","project_name":"Wildwood (Alamo Pintado Road and Old Mission Drive)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/solvang-wildwood-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"solvang-santa-barbara","city":"Solvang","county":"Santa Barbara","region":"Central Coast","decision_date":"2025-03-07","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.santabarbara.courts.ca.gov/tentative-ruling/25cv01519","source_label":"Santa Barbara County Superior Court","notes":"S.Y. Valley Residents Association v. City of Solvang (25CV01519), Santa Barbara County Superior Court; Joshua Richman and Lots on Alamo Pintado LLC are real parties in interest.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:16:48.995088"},{"id":"1446920d-47a6-49bc-aed5-7b3b71bee6df","project_slug":"cupertino-scofield-vista-heights-2024","project_name":"Scofield Drive and Vista Heights Builder's Remedy Projects","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/cupertino-scofield-vista-heights-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"cupertino-santa-clara","city":"Cupertino","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2025-04-08","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://sanjosespotlight.com/cupertino-sued-over-expired-housing-proposals-builders-remedy/","source_label":"San Jose Spotlight","notes":"Two petitions by YIMBY Law, the California Housing Defense Fund and the applicants, Santa Clara County Superior Court.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:21:52.364441"},{"id":"7869e254-bf27-4768-a00d-541ed489e685","project_slug":"mountain-view-tyrella-2023","project_name":"294-296 Tyrella Avenue Condominiums","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/mountain-view-tyrella-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"mountain-view-santa-clara","city":"Mountain View","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2025-04-08","body":"City Council","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"approve","vote_for":6,"vote_against":1,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.mv-voice.com/housing/2025/04/09/mountain-view-reluctantly-approves-seven-story-builders-remedy-project/","source_label":"Mountain View Voice","notes":"Approved the 80-unit condominium project; John McAlister voted no.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:14:18.67142"},{"id":"fe060a19-19e1-4eec-bfc8-6faa5a45331b","project_slug":"santa-barbara-505-los-olivos-2024","project_name":"505 East Los Olivos Street (Behind the Old Mission)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/santa-barbara-505-los-olivos-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"santa-barbara-santa-barbara","city":"Santa Barbara","county":"Santa Barbara","region":"Central Coast","decision_date":"2025-05-12","body":"Staff","action":"deemed_incomplete","action_label":"deemed application incomplete","staff_recommendation":"none","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.santabarbara.courts.ca.gov/tentative-ruling/25cv03180-0","source_label":"Santa Barbara Superior Court","notes":"Fourth incompleteness finding.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:30:03.863987"},{"id":"4d1bc368-f3f0-4973-b98b-59bfc4fbf0d2","project_slug":"mountain-view-tyrella-2023","project_name":"294-296 Tyrella Avenue Condominiums","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/mountain-view-tyrella-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"mountain-view-santa-clara","city":"Mountain View","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2025-05-14","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.mv-voice.com/housing/2025/05/20/mountain-view-residents-sue-city-to-halt-seven-story-builders-remedy-project/","source_label":"Mountain View Voice","notes":"Whisman Action Committee suit against the city, also naming the developer; seeks a stay.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:14:18.67142"},{"id":"e9c01000-1874-4569-8d0d-d4f9114a5181","project_slug":"santa-barbara-505-los-olivos-2024","project_name":"505 East Los Olivos Street (Behind the Old Mission)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/santa-barbara-505-los-olivos-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"santa-barbara-santa-barbara","city":"Santa Barbara","county":"Santa Barbara","region":"Central Coast","decision_date":"2025-05-22","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.newspress.com/2026/04/29/developers-lose-round-in-court-but-controversial-housing-behind-old-mission-grinds-forward/","source_label":"Santa Barbara News-Press","notes":"The Mission LLC v. City of Santa Barbara (25CV03180), Santa Barbara County Superior Court.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:30:03.863987"},{"id":"aa88da4d-d059-4197-9495-91b5a80338b1","project_slug":"del-mar-seaside-ridge-2022","project_name":"Seaside Ridge — Del Mar North Bluff","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/del-mar-seaside-ridge-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"del-mar-san-diego","city":"Del Mar","county":"San Diego","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2025-06-12","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://thecoastnews.com/judge-grants-del-mars-motion-to-dismiss-seaside-ridge-petition/","source_label":"The Coast News","notes":"Tentative ruling by Judge Wendy Behan granting the city's motion to dismiss the first suit as premature for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:34:12.460339"},{"id":"bfc81e4f-ff43-4e4b-b536-fec3228aba95","project_slug":"los-altos-hills-silver-oaks-2023","project_name":"Silver Oaks Senior Housing (10728 and 10758 Mora Drive)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-altos-hills-silver-oaks-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"los-altos-hills-santa-clara","city":"Los Altos Hills","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2025-06-18","body":"City Council","action":"denied","action_label":"denied","staff_recommendation":"deny","vote_for":5,"vote_against":0,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.losaltoshills.ca.gov/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Minutes/_06182025-2883","source_label":"Town minutes","notes":"Denied both conditional development permits with findings under Gov. Code 65589.5(d).","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:18:30.76303"},{"id":"adb67fe3-f0b2-4f70-b1b7-98e6da405eee","project_slug":"newport-beach-housing-element-2024","project_name":"Newport Beach Housing Plan and Measure H","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/newport-beach-housing-element-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"newport-beach-orange","city":"Newport Beach","county":"Orange","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2025-06-18","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.newportbeachindy.com/?p=67441","source_label":"Newport Beach Independent","notes":"Orange County Superior Court upheld the rezoning against both suits. An appeal is pending.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:24:52.59738"},{"id":"05762e63-3af7-4ba6-8913-d94dc83b6f28","project_slug":"danville-anderson-ranch-2023","project_name":"Anderson Ranch Builder's Remedy Subdivision","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/danville-anderson-ranch-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"danville-contra-costa","city":"Danville","county":"Contra Costa","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2025-07-11","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.pleasantonweekly.com/courts/2025/07/26/judge-rules-against-danville-in-builders-remedy-case/","source_label":"Pleasanton Weekly","notes":"Ruled that the town violated the Permit Streamlining Act and the Housing Accountability Act.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:22:12.451728"},{"id":"5b537e44-1527-45b3-ba1d-75b8b35f1ea1","project_slug":"livermore-eden-housing-2022","project_name":"Downtown Livermore Apartments (Eden Housing)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/livermore-eden-housing-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"livermore-alameda","city":"Livermore","county":"Alameda","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2025-07-28","body":"City Council","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":4,"vote_against":1,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.pleasantonweekly.com/city-politics/2025/07/30/ratify-reaffirm-readopt-livermore-council-again-endorses-eden-housing-project-provisions/","source_label":"Pleasanton Weekly","notes":"Ratified, reaffirmed and readopted the amended and restated agreement, excluding Veterans Park. Ben Barrientos voted no.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:27:06.481007"},{"id":"4e9ae59a-de97-4639-8bbd-645557e46764","project_slug":"solvang-wildwood-2023","project_name":"Wildwood (Alamo Pintado Road and Old Mission Drive)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/solvang-wildwood-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"solvang-santa-barbara","city":"Solvang","county":"Santa Barbara","region":"Central Coast","decision_date":"2025-08-05","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.santabarbara.courts.ca.gov/system/files/tentative-rulings/demurrers-2-25cv01519-nf.pdf","source_label":"Santa Barbara County Superior Court","notes":"Sustained the city's demurrer without leave to amend, finding the claims premature. The posted tentative ruling also sustained the developer's demurrer; the Santa Maria Times reported that the judge ruled only on the city's.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:16:48.995088"},{"id":"6f8caeac-22c6-4a62-9e77-b5a607ffb808","project_slug":"beverly-hills-linden-2022","project_name":"125-129 S. Linden Drive Mixed-Use Tower (Beverly Hills)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/beverly-hills-linden-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"beverly-hills-los-angeles","city":"Beverly Hills","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2025-08-12","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://therealdeal.com/la/2025/08/14/beverly-hills-must-let-165-unit-builders-remedy-project-proceed-court-ruling/","source_label":"The Real Deal","notes":"Judge Curtis Kin ruled that the city violated state housing law and ordered it to reverse its denials and continue reviewing the project.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:38:25.607413"},{"id":"01795833-6d44-44a3-a78a-f5004a0278e0","project_slug":"norwalk-shelter-ban-2024","project_name":"Norwalk Ban on Shelters and Supportive Housing","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/norwalk-shelter-ban-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"norwalk-los-angeles","city":"Norwalk","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2025-09-05","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bonta-newsom-administration-reach-settlement-city-norwalk-over","source_label":"California Attorney General","notes":"Stipulated final judgment entered: repeal of the ban, a $250,000 housing trust fund deposit and reporting to HCD through 2029.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:33:51.309969"},{"id":"ba50fbfd-5fab-4257-abc2-3f58d142979c","project_slug":"los-altos-hills-silver-oaks-2023","project_name":"Silver Oaks Senior Housing (10728 and 10758 Mora Drive)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-altos-hills-silver-oaks-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"los-altos-hills-santa-clara","city":"Los Altos Hills","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2025-09-15","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.losaltosonline.com/news/housing-lawsuit-filed-against-los-altos-hills/article_b874b0d4-a2a1-4c6d-9a32-3c2c58d98c3c.html","source_label":"Los Altos Town Crier","notes":"California Housing Defense Fund and Forrest Linebarger v. Town of Los Altos Hills, Santa Clara County Superior Court.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:18:30.76303"},{"id":"7ffaf5eb-f14b-4914-9103-77b6bcd1287b","project_slug":"la-canada-foothill-2022","project_name":"600 Foothill Boulevard Mixed-Use","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/la-canada-foothill-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"la-canada-flintridge-los-angeles","city":"La Cañada Flintridge","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2025-09-18","body":"Planning Commission","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://lcf.ca.gov/lcfhousingpolicy-legalmatters/","source_label":"City of La Cañada Flintridge","notes":"Approved the tentative tract map, conditional use permit and tree removal permit.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:43:43.644978"},{"id":"e9108e67-a975-417a-b6ad-f765e2bb0c7f","project_slug":"santa-clara-county-almaden-woodcliff-2023","project_name":"Almaden Road and Woodcliff Court Builder's Remedy Subdivisions","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/santa-clara-county-almaden-woodcliff-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"unincorporated-santa-clara-county-south-san-jose-area-santa-clara","city":"Unincorporated Santa Clara County (South San Jose area)","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2025-09-25","body":"Planning Commission","action":"appeal_rejected","action_label":"appeal rejected","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":5,"vote_against":2,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://sanjosespotlight.com/santa-clara-county-finds-way-to-fight-builders-remedy/","source_label":"San Jose Spotlight","notes":"Denied the appeals on both projects. For denial: Rauser, Escobar, Levy, Chang Hetterly, Cohen. Against: Belska, O'Donoghue.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:13:06.42699"},{"id":"9667998f-a4f4-46d0-a8c1-6bb8361e5287","project_slug":"la-canada-foothill-2022","project_name":"600 Foothill Boulevard Mixed-Use","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/la-canada-foothill-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"la-canada-flintridge-los-angeles","city":"La Cañada Flintridge","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2025-10-03","body":"City Council","action":"appeal_upheld","action_label":"appeal upheld","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://lcf.ca.gov/lcfhousingpolicy-legalmatters/","source_label":"City of La Cañada Flintridge","notes":"Heard the developer's appeal of one tract map condition, removed the condition and approved the vesting tentative tract map.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:43:43.644978"},{"id":"76721263-83b6-4543-9d5c-639c8777e490","project_slug":"livermore-eden-housing-2022","project_name":"Downtown Livermore Apartments (Eden Housing)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/livermore-eden-housing-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"livermore-alameda","city":"Livermore","county":"Alameda","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2025-10-07","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://calawyers.org/real-property-law/california-case-summary-update-november-2025-real-property-case-summaries/","source_label":"California Lawyers Association","notes":"First District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's November 2024 ruling that the 2024 readoption violated Elections Code section 9241.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:27:06.481007"},{"id":"a77b0d66-70c4-4891-bfdb-fa17e71a31e4","project_slug":"redondo-beach-one-redondo-2022","project_name":"One Redondo — AES Power Plant Waterfront Redevelopment","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/redondo-beach-one-redondo-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"redondo-beach-los-angeles","city":"Redondo Beach","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2025-10-10","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://easyreadernews.com/aes-ruling-against-redondo-may-open-door-to-builders-remedy-developments-statewide","source_label":"Easy Reader","notes":"New Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach (B336042), Second District Court of Appeal: the housing element did not comply with state law; the trial court must issue a writ requiring revision.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:29:19.126864"},{"id":"5ea52120-6b95-4d29-a758-7d01183bdea5","project_slug":"la-canada-foothill-2022","project_name":"600 Foothill Boulevard Mixed-Use","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/la-canada-foothill-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"la-canada-flintridge-los-angeles","city":"La Cañada Flintridge","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2025-10-17","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://lcf.ca.gov/lcfhousingpolicy-legalmatters/","source_label":"City of La Cañada Flintridge","notes":"Denied the developer's motion for $6.3 million in damages.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:43:43.644978"},{"id":"bd3e6098-d36a-4589-9bc0-e4482a994b91","project_slug":"glendale-sears-site-2025","project_name":"Trammell Crow Sears Site Redevelopment","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/glendale-sears-site-2025","jurisdiction_slug":"glendale-los-angeles","city":"Glendale","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2025-10-21","body":"City Council","action":"denied","action_label":"denied","staff_recommendation":"approve","vote_for":4,"vote_against":1,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":true,"source_url":"https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/office-of-the-city-manager/fact-page/236-n-central-sears-site-redevelopment","source_label":"City of Glendale","notes":"Denied the Stage II Design Review application; Mayor Ara Najarian cast the dissenting vote. The council rescinded the denial in late January 2026 after HCD's notice of violation.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:31:54.687607"},{"id":"d82e607c-c3ef-4ac3-9409-510464679d0a","project_slug":"santa-cruz-county-builders-remedy-2024","project_name":"Live Oak Builder's Remedy Projects (841 Capitola Road and 3500 Paul Sweet Road)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/santa-cruz-county-builders-remedy-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"unincorporated-santa-cruz-county-live-oak-area-santa-cruz","city":"Unincorporated Santa Cruz County (Live Oak area)","county":"Santa Cruz","region":"Central Coast","decision_date":"2025-10-22","body":"Planning Commission","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://lookout.co/county-planning-commission-approves-workbench-project-on-capitola-road-neighbors-plan-appeal/story","source_label":"Lookout Santa Cruz","notes":"Approved 841 Capitola Road unanimously; individual votes were not reported.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:18:37.375093"},{"id":"ce9c0087-e3ed-411a-a7f8-83b66655fee3","project_slug":"la-canada-foothill-2022","project_name":"600 Foothill Boulevard Mixed-Use","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/la-canada-foothill-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"la-canada-flintridge-los-angeles","city":"La Cañada Flintridge","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2025-10-27","body":"Court","action":"appeal_filed","action_label":"appeal filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://lcf.ca.gov/lcfhousingpolicy-legalmatters/","source_label":"City of La Cañada Flintridge","notes":"The developer appealed the October 17, 2025 damages ruling.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:43:43.644978"},{"id":"0e2efc8d-3f85-49bc-a903-fabd873d5b5c","project_slug":"santa-cruz-county-builders-remedy-2024","project_name":"Live Oak Builder's Remedy Projects (841 Capitola Road and 3500 Paul Sweet Road)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/santa-cruz-county-builders-remedy-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"unincorporated-santa-cruz-county-live-oak-area-santa-cruz","city":"Unincorporated Santa Cruz County (Live Oak area)","county":"Santa Cruz","region":"Central Coast","decision_date":"2025-11-03","body":"Board of Supervisors","action":"appeal_filed","action_label":"appeal filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://cdi.santacruzcountyca.gov/UPC/GetInvolved/MajorProjects/MajorProjects-ProjectDetails/TabId/12259/ArtMID/34572/ArticleID/1115/CategoryID/54/CategoryName/Major-Projects/841-Capitola-Road.aspx","source_label":"County of Santa Cruz","notes":"Michael Reis appealed the 841 Capitola Road approval for Supporters of Reasonable Development for Live Oak.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:18:37.375093"},{"id":"4d762479-bc5f-4e58-a5a4-1011e979e479","project_slug":"fairfax-school-street-plaza-2024","project_name":"School Street Plaza (95 Broadway)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/fairfax-school-street-plaza-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"fairfax-marin","city":"Fairfax","county":"Marin","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2025-11-22","body":"Staff","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"none","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/11/b7ef27e6-0-fairfax-95-broadway-approval-letter-with-conditions-and-mitigation-measures-11-22-25.pdf","source_label":"Town of Fairfax","notes":"Approved the project with conditions under the ministerial process; remaining deficiencies deferred to building permit review.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:23:28.647003"},{"id":"f9a24547-3591-4718-aeb9-9a3f5bbe6c19","project_slug":"los-gatos-vista-capri-2024","project_name":"Vista Capri (14288 Capri Drive)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-gatos-vista-capri-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"los-gatos-santa-clara","city":"Los Gatos","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2025-12-05","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://losgatan.com/did-los-gatos-housing-element-suddenly-fall-out-of-compliance/","source_label":"Los Gatan","notes":"Second amended petition in Los Gatos LLC's suit against the Town of Los Gatos, Santa Clara County Superior Court. The suit was first filed in July 2025.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:11:50.815075"},{"id":"fcbb7f5c-bf4d-4c93-88f1-87649a4f481d","project_slug":"san-francisco-family-zoning-2025","project_name":"San Francisco Family Zoning Plan","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/san-francisco-family-zoning-2025","jurisdiction_slug":"san-francisco-san-francisco","city":"San Francisco","county":"San Francisco","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2025-12-09","body":"Board of Supervisors","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":6,"vote_against":4,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/urban-development/sf-family-zoning-plan-passes-upzoning-approved/article_3938b98d-df49-401f-b857-18e03c72c848.html","source_label":"San Francisco Examiner","notes":"Final approval of the Family Zoning Plan ordinances. The initial vote on Dec. 2, 2025 was 7-4; Supervisor Alan Wong was absent for the final vote.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:20:33.835438"},{"id":"a5c60768-d06c-41bb-8717-6163d665d49f","project_slug":"redondo-beach-401-pch-2025","project_name":"Nivasa: 401-417 South Pacific Coast Highway","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/redondo-beach-401-pch-2025","jurisdiction_slug":"redondo-beach-los-angeles","city":"Redondo Beach","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2025-12-18","body":"Planning Commission","action":"denied","action_label":"denied","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.redondo.org/departments/community_development/planning/current_projects.php","source_label":"City of Redondo Beach","notes":"Denied the coastal development permit and two of three density bonus concessions. The vote was unanimous; the tally was not reported.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:27:26.289469"},{"id":"ca649f5c-6a31-4420-b0bd-a2246939adf8","project_slug":"san-francisco-family-zoning-2025","project_name":"San Francisco Family Zoning Plan","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/san-francisco-family-zoning-2025","jurisdiction_slug":"san-francisco-san-francisco","city":"San Francisco","county":"San Francisco","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2026-01-09","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.reedsmith.com/our-insights/blogs/viewpoints/102mekj/caught-in-a-pickle-a-ceqa-challenge-to-the-sf-family-zoning-plan-creates-uncer/","source_label":"Reed Smith","notes":"CEQA petition by Neighborhoods United SF, Small Business Forward, Romalyn Schmaltz and Paul Erickson, Case No. CPF26519501, San Francisco County Superior Court.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:20:33.835438"},{"id":"b3fbb3d5-3a99-440f-98bb-2f8a027db838","project_slug":"livermore-eden-housing-2022","project_name":"Downtown Livermore Apartments (Eden Housing)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/livermore-eden-housing-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"livermore-alameda","city":"Livermore","county":"Alameda","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2026-01-14","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.livermorevine.com/courts/2026/01/20/state-supreme-court-rejects-livermore-citizen-groups-petition-to-review-eden-housing-appeal/","source_label":"Livermore Vine","notes":"California Supreme Court denied Move Eden Housing's petition for review.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:27:06.481007"},{"id":"58062985-927e-4170-a015-0776a6d496c9","project_slug":"santa-cruz-county-builders-remedy-2024","project_name":"Live Oak Builder's Remedy Projects (841 Capitola Road and 3500 Paul Sweet Road)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/santa-cruz-county-builders-remedy-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"unincorporated-santa-cruz-county-live-oak-area-santa-cruz","city":"Unincorporated Santa Cruz County (Live Oak area)","county":"Santa Cruz","region":"Central Coast","decision_date":"2026-01-14","body":"Planning Commission","action":"continued","action_label":"continued to a later date","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www2.santacruzcountyca.gov/planning/plnmeetings/PLNSupMaterial/PC/Agendas/2026/20260325/008.pdf","source_label":"County of Santa Cruz","notes":"Continued 3500 Paul Sweet Road to a date uncertain and directed staff to provide more information.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:18:37.375093"},{"id":"1b7b0a53-d3da-4aba-8b68-22f2c0906661","project_slug":"redondo-beach-one-redondo-2022","project_name":"One Redondo — AES Power Plant Waterfront Redevelopment","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/redondo-beach-one-redondo-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"redondo-beach-los-angeles","city":"Redondo Beach","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2026-01-28","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://supreme.courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/supremecourt/default/documents/conference%20results%20-%20012826.pdf","source_label":"Supreme Court of California","notes":"California Supreme Court denied review and depublication (S294028).","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:29:19.126864"},{"id":"6a5e4e07-89d4-4ced-b6ca-eb5ba4dc1215","project_slug":"los-gatos-arya-luxe-2023","project_name":"The Arya and The Luxe: Los Gatos Boulevard Builder's Remedy Projects","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-gatos-arya-luxe-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"los-gatos-santa-clara","city":"Los Gatos","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2026-01-29","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://losgatan.com/judge-sides-with-developers-and-housing-activists-in-lawsuit-over-vesting-rights/","source_label":"Los Gatan","notes":"Ruled that each incompleteness determination opens a new 90-day period; denied the town's motion. Not a final judgment.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:19:45.389007"},{"id":"b524aaa2-22e1-45b5-8d59-e6f11104ddcc","project_slug":"santa-cruz-county-builders-remedy-2024","project_name":"Live Oak Builder's Remedy Projects (841 Capitola Road and 3500 Paul Sweet Road)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/santa-cruz-county-builders-remedy-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"unincorporated-santa-cruz-county-live-oak-area-santa-cruz","city":"Unincorporated Santa Cruz County (Live Oak area)","county":"Santa Cruz","region":"Central Coast","decision_date":"2026-02-10","body":"Board of Supervisors","action":"appeal_rejected","action_label":"appeal rejected","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":4,"vote_against":1,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://lookout.co/supervisors-reject-neighbors-appeal-of-57-unit-capitola-road-project/story","source_label":"Lookout Santa Cruz","notes":"Rejected the appeal and approved 841 Capitola Road; Supervisor Justin Cummings dissented.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:18:37.375093"},{"id":"c9c221f2-c53c-4159-98b0-f265125e2484","project_slug":"san-francisco-family-zoning-2025","project_name":"San Francisco Family Zoning Plan","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/san-francisco-family-zoning-2025","jurisdiction_slug":"san-francisco-san-francisco","city":"San Francisco","county":"San Francisco","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2026-02-12","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.yimbylaw.org/sf-family-zoning-plan","source_label":"YIMBY Law","notes":"Petition by YIMBY Law, the California Housing Defense Fund and Californians for Homeownership under housing element law. First merits hearing set for Nov. 18, 2026.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:20:33.835438"},{"id":"354073d6-b846-4fcf-9ae7-d45956afdce2","project_slug":"redondo-beach-401-pch-2025","project_name":"Nivasa: 401-417 South Pacific Coast Highway","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/redondo-beach-401-pch-2025","jurisdiction_slug":"redondo-beach-los-angeles","city":"Redondo Beach","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2026-02-17","body":"City Council","action":"appeal_upheld","action_label":"appeal upheld","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://easyreadernews.com/redondo-beach-approves-four-story-residential-building-for-pch","source_label":"Easy Reader","notes":"Granted the developer's appeal and approved the project. The vote was unanimous; the tally was not reported.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:27:26.289469"},{"id":"9f8476d4-2298-4f6a-a89a-999dc0a5e291","project_slug":"cupertino-vallco-2015","project_name":"Vallco Town Center / The Rise","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/cupertino-vallco-2015","jurisdiction_slug":"cupertino-santa-clara","city":"Cupertino","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2026-02-27","body":"Staff","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"none","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.cupertino.gov/Your-City/Departments/Community-Development/Planning/Major-Projects/The-Rise-Vallco-SB35-Application","source_label":"City of Cupertino","notes":"Approved the third modification: 2,669 units, 356 affordable.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:50:10.167267"},{"id":"46ede453-74ac-4758-9474-675082dbcab9","project_slug":"santa-cruz-county-builders-remedy-2024","project_name":"Live Oak Builder's Remedy Projects (841 Capitola Road and 3500 Paul Sweet Road)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/santa-cruz-county-builders-remedy-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"unincorporated-santa-cruz-county-live-oak-area-santa-cruz","city":"Unincorporated Santa Cruz County (Live Oak area)","county":"Santa Cruz","region":"Central Coast","decision_date":"2026-03-17","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://santacruzlocal.org/2026/03/27/developer-residents-sue-county-live-oak-apartment-proposals/","source_label":"Santa Cruz Local","notes":"Live Oak residents, including Michael Reis, sued the county and the Board of Supervisors over the 841 Capitola Road approval.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:18:37.375093"},{"id":"70daa5fb-4788-44d6-a7e2-e213472da9c1","project_slug":"santa-cruz-county-builders-remedy-2024","project_name":"Live Oak Builder's Remedy Projects (841 Capitola Road and 3500 Paul Sweet Road)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/santa-cruz-county-builders-remedy-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"unincorporated-santa-cruz-county-live-oak-area-santa-cruz","city":"Unincorporated Santa Cruz County (Live Oak area)","county":"Santa Cruz","region":"Central Coast","decision_date":"2026-03-23","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://lookout.co/santa-cruz-county-facing-lawsuits-over-two-contentious-housing-developments-in-live-oak/story","source_label":"Lookout Santa Cruz","notes":"Workbench sued the county and its Planning Commission over 3500 Paul Sweet Road, alleging a missed decision deadline.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:18:37.375093"},{"id":"4cdc1961-8c73-4ce0-8cad-d9cbe45c2535","project_slug":"costa-mesa-housing-element-2022","project_name":"Costa Mesa Housing Element and Rezoning","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/costa-mesa-housing-element-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"costa-mesa-orange","city":"Costa Mesa","county":"Orange","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2026-04-07","body":"City Council","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":5,"vote_against":2,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.costamesaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/63488/639165396180770000","source_label":"City of Costa Mesa","notes":"Adopted Ordinance 2026-03, housing element rezoning declared exempt from Measure Y.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:26:20.09222"},{"id":"a28b2c47-a45c-4fa2-b804-14b7f2fd5b23","project_slug":"los-gatos-arya-luxe-2023","project_name":"The Arya and The Luxe: Los Gatos Boulevard Builder's Remedy Projects","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/los-gatos-arya-luxe-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"los-gatos-santa-clara","city":"Los Gatos","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2026-04-21","body":"City Council","action":"appeal_upheld","action_label":"appeal upheld","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":3,"vote_against":2,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://mccmeetings.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/losgatos-pubu/MEET-Minutes-3423e578564544c4b346a056e5fd6d16.pdf","source_label":"Town minutes","notes":"Granted the applicants' appeals for The Arya and The Luxe (Resolutions 2026-020 and 2026-021).","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:19:45.389007"},{"id":"d11e424f-5ffb-4157-80ad-7155ef4b8999","project_slug":"santa-barbara-505-los-olivos-2024","project_name":"505 East Los Olivos Street (Behind the Old Mission)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/santa-barbara-505-los-olivos-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"santa-barbara-santa-barbara","city":"Santa Barbara","county":"Santa Barbara","region":"Central Coast","decision_date":"2026-04-22","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.santabarbara.courts.ca.gov/tentative-ruling/25cv03180-0","source_label":"Santa Barbara Superior Court","notes":"Denied the developer's writ claims.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:30:03.863987"},{"id":"c167654a-efa0-4398-8468-8ee8f8c98411","project_slug":"huntington-beach-housing-element-2021","project_name":"Huntington Beach 6th Cycle Housing Program — 13,368 Units","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/huntington-beach-housing-element-2021","jurisdiction_slug":"huntington-beach-orange","city":"Huntington Beach","county":"Orange","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2026-05-14","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/30-2023-01312235-CU-WM-CJC_Minute%20Order%20SD%20%28JO%20Signature%29%5B1%5D.pdf","source_label":"Court minute order","notes":"Judge Katherine A. Bacal imposed penalties of $10,000 a month from January 2025 through May 2026 and $50,000 a month from June 2026 until the city cures the violation.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:42:59.673711"},{"id":"2da50f76-5fab-44ba-beda-277972436a1a","project_slug":"del-mar-seaside-ridge-2022","project_name":"Seaside Ridge — Del Mar North Bluff","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/del-mar-seaside-ridge-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"del-mar-san-diego","city":"Del Mar","county":"San Diego","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2026-05-19","body":"City Council","action":"denied","action_label":"denied","staff_recommendation":"deny","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://thecoastnews.com/del-mar-rejects-seaside-ridge-concedes-north-bluff-housing-likely/","source_label":"The Coast News","notes":"Unanimous vote to deny the application as incomplete; the developer says it was deemed complete when the city missed a 60-day deadline.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:34:12.460339"},{"id":"aca65fe0-872d-49eb-b7a8-06b6146637f3","project_slug":"davis-village-farms-2026","project_name":"Village Farms Davis (Measure V)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/davis-village-farms-2026","jurisdiction_slug":"davis-yolo","city":"Davis","county":"Yolo","region":"Sacramento","decision_date":"2026-06-02","body":"Voters","action":"referendum_failed","action_label":"referendum failed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":11414,"vote_against":11690,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://davisvanguard.org/2026/07/davis-measure-v-results-analysis/","source_label":"Davis Vanguard","notes":"Measure V. Certified result.","created_at":"2026-10-19T22:10:03.107284"},{"id":"f65c0ff8-9e26-4045-8719-9a3242ea4098","project_slug":"santa-barbara-505-los-olivos-2024","project_name":"505 East Los Olivos Street (Behind the Old Mission)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/santa-barbara-505-los-olivos-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"santa-barbara-santa-barbara","city":"Santa Barbara","county":"Santa Barbara","region":"Central Coast","decision_date":"2026-06-02","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.independent.com/2026/06/10/federal-judge-dismisses-mission-llcs-lawsuit-against-state-city-of-santa-barbara/","source_label":"Santa Barbara Independent","notes":"U.S. District Court dismissed the federal suit against the state and city with leave to amend.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:30:03.863987"},{"id":"e8e46ba7-75a4-485b-b08c-7b4b1c7ac966","project_slug":"huntington-beach-housing-element-2021","project_name":"Huntington Beach 6th Cycle Housing Program — 13,368 Units","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/huntington-beach-housing-element-2021","jurisdiction_slug":"huntington-beach-orange","city":"Huntington Beach","county":"Orange","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2026-06-16","body":"City Council","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/news_detail_T4_R641.php","source_label":"City of Huntington Beach","notes":"Adopted the housing element update, the first phase of complying with the court's orders; zoning changes due within 120 days. Propmodo reported Williams as the sole dissenting vote; the tally was not reported.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:42:59.673711"},{"id":"c50f179b-6b7e-4da9-b8a2-6044c2588f0d","project_slug":"santa-clara-county-almaden-woodcliff-2023","project_name":"Almaden Road and Woodcliff Court Builder's Remedy Subdivisions","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/santa-clara-county-almaden-woodcliff-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"unincorporated-santa-clara-county-south-san-jose-area-santa-clara","city":"Unincorporated Santa Clara County (South San Jose area)","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2026-07-10","body":"Staff","action":"deemed_incomplete","action_label":"deemed application incomplete","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://stgenpln.blob.core.windows.net/document/SB330_ProjectsList.pdf","source_label":"County of Santa Clara","notes":"Woodcliff Court application PLN24-062-SB330, per the county's SB 330 project list.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:13:06.42699"},{"id":"be34bb11-959b-49bf-a0db-fd03b1393707","project_slug":"costa-mesa-housing-element-2022","project_name":"Costa Mesa Housing Element and Rezoning","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/costa-mesa-housing-element-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"costa-mesa-orange","city":"Costa Mesa","county":"Orange","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2026-07-16","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/costa-mesa.pdf","source_label":"Court filing","notes":"People ex rel. Bonta and HCD v. City of Costa Mesa, Orange County Superior Court.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:26:20.09222"},{"id":"0b0dd121-e703-49f4-a42a-2523d9ea06a4","project_slug":"redondo-beach-ten21-2022","project_name":"Ten21 Harbor (Former SEA Lab Site, 1021 N. Harbor Drive)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/redondo-beach-ten21-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"redondo-beach-los-angeles","city":"Redondo Beach","county":"Los Angeles","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2026-07-30","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2026/b337897.html","source_label":"Court of Appeal","notes":"The Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Four, affirmed the judgment in a published opinion (B337897).","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:10:29.550153"},{"id":"21fa6e9b-1277-469d-83b3-48bd640c2a91","project_slug":"livermore-eden-housing-2022","project_name":"Downtown Livermore Apartments (Eden Housing)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/livermore-eden-housing-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"livermore-alameda","city":"Livermore","county":"Alameda","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2026-07-31","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.pleasantonweekly.com/courts/2026/08/13/opponents-of-eden-housing-in-livermore-lose-bid-for-reimbursement-of-775000-in-attorneys-fees/","source_label":"Pleasanton Weekly","notes":"Judge Michael Markman denied Move Eden Housing's motion for $779,623 in attorneys' fees.","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:27:06.481007"},{"id":"8b33dd81-0364-479f-8b26-2c45eac80ea3","project_slug":"brisbane-baylands-2005","project_name":"Brisbane Baylands Specific Plan","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/brisbane-baylands-2005","jurisdiction_slug":"brisbane-san-mateo","city":"Brisbane","county":"San Mateo","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2026-08-13","body":"Planning Commission","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":5,"vote_against":0,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.brisbaneca.gov/228/Brisbane-Baylands","source_label":"City of Brisbane","notes":"Recommended that the City Council certify the final EIR and adopt the specific plan with modifications.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:21:04.658802"},{"id":"818c0a34-d9d1-4677-a6af-586713cf5473","project_slug":"newport-beach-housing-element-2024","project_name":"Newport Beach Housing Plan and Measure H","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/newport-beach-housing-element-2024","jurisdiction_slug":"newport-beach-orange","city":"Newport Beach","county":"Orange","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2026-08-19","body":"Court","action":"ruling_issued","action_label":"ruling issued","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://voiceofoc.org/2026/08/judge-orders-newport-beach-to-move-forward-with-ballot-initiatives/","source_label":"Voice of OC","notes":"Ordered the city to move forward with Measure H for the Nov. 3, 2026 ballot.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:24:52.59738"},{"id":"ad93dc90-7869-4081-87ce-fb2781938bc7","project_slug":"cupertino-vallco-2015","project_name":"Vallco Town Center / The Rise","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/cupertino-vallco-2015","jurisdiction_slug":"cupertino-santa-clara","city":"Cupertino","county":"Santa Clara","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2026-08-24","body":"Staff","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"none","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.cupertino.gov/Your-City/Departments/Community-Development/Planning/Major-Projects/The-Rise-Vallco-SB35-Application","source_label":"City of Cupertino","notes":"Approved a partial plan modification for Blocks 1 and 2 (DIR-2026-003).","created_at":"2026-10-21T20:50:10.167267"},{"id":"31741d8c-4ded-434a-8d3d-7a50a9b78ed3","project_slug":"costa-mesa-housing-element-2022","project_name":"Costa Mesa Housing Element and Rezoning","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/costa-mesa-housing-element-2022","jurisdiction_slug":"costa-mesa-orange","city":"Costa Mesa","county":"Orange","region":"SoCal","decision_date":"2026-09-01","body":"City Council","action":"approved","action_label":"approved","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":7,"vote_against":0,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.costamesa1st.com/post/costa-mesa-city-hall-update-for-september-2026-thousands-of-future-housing-units-move-forward-as-r","source_label":"Costa Mesa First","notes":"Adopted a housing element amendment adding 95 sites.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:26:20.09222"},{"id":"3563faa6-276a-47ca-8e05-95a44e7ef6a9","project_slug":"menlo-park-80-willow-2023","project_name":"80 Willow Road Towers (Former Sunset Magazine Campus)","project_url":"https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/menlo-park-80-willow-2023","jurisdiction_slug":"menlo-park-san-mateo","city":"Menlo Park","county":"San Mateo","region":"Bay Area","decision_date":"2026-10-02","body":"Court","action":"lawsuit_filed","action_label":"lawsuit filed","staff_recommendation":"unknown","vote_for":null,"vote_against":null,"vote_abstain":null,"overrode_staff":false,"source_url":"https://www.menlopark.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/community-development/documents/projects/under-review/80-willow-rd/willow-project-v.-city-of-menlo-park-san-mateo-county-superior-court-tc26-1000.pdf","source_label":"Court filing","notes":"Willow Project LLC v. City of Menlo Park, San Mateo County Superior Court.","created_at":"2026-10-20T17:14:19.17336"}]}