Back to the case page

Who Killed the Building? · Case brief · October 22, 2026

Davis Innovation & Sustainability Campus 2022 (DiSC 2022 / Measure H)

Davis · Yolo County · California · https://whokilledthebuilding.com/projects/davis-disc-2022

A proposed 118-acre mixed-use innovation campus east of Mace Boulevard and north of Interstate 80 in unincorporated Yolo County adjacent to the eastern edge of the City of Davis. Developers: Ramco Enterprises (Dan Ramos) and The Buzz Oates Group (Troy Estacio). The project required annexation of prime agricultural land into the City of Davis — triggering the voter approval requirement of Measure J/R/D (passed 2000, renewed 2010 and 2020). The DiSC 2022 proposal (Measure H) included: approximately 1.1 million square feet of office, laboratory, R&D, and advanced manufacturing space; 460 residential units (at least 74 affordable, primarily for UC Davis employees, faculty, researchers, and graduates); a hotel and conference center; parks, plazas, and community sports fields; and a carbon neutrality commitment by 2040. An earlier version (DISC / Measure B) was put to voters in November 2020 and failed 52-48% by ~1,269 votes. Developers revised the proposal — reducing the site from 187 acres to 118 acres, cutting traffic projections by 55%, and increasing housing and sustainability components — and returned with DiSC 2022. In June 2022, Davis voters rejected Measure H by 63.5% to 36.5% — a wider margin than the first defeat, with approximately 3,000 votes separating YES and NO. Analysts attributed the wider margin partly to a lawsuit filed by Councilmember Dan Carson against opponents' ballot argument language, which generated major backlash. Developers have not returned with a third proposal. The site remains agricultural farmland as of May 2026.

Project facts

JurisdictionDavis, Yolo County
StatusWithdrawn
Project typeMixed-Use
AddressEast of Mace Boulevard at Interstate 80, Davis (unincorporated Yolo County), CA 95618
Units proposed460
Affordable units74
Date filedJuly 1, 2021
Date approvedFebruary 1, 2022
Date deniedJune 7, 2022
Delay24 months
Housing elementIn compliance (HCD)

Mechanism and what it did

Decision-making bodies

No deciding body has been recorded for this case yet.

Timeline

DateEventWhat the record shows
November 7, 2000Measure J Passed — Voter Approval Required for Peripheral DevelopmentDavis voters pass Measure J — the "Citizens' Right to Vote on Future Use of Open Space and Agricultural Lands" — establishing a requirement that any annexation of agricultural or open space land at the edge of Davis for urban development must receive citywide voter approval. This mechanism creates the structure that will ultimately kill DiSC twice. Davis Vanguard: https://davisvanguard.org/2025/05/davis-measure-j-housing-constraints/
January 1, 2014City Issues Request for Innovation Park Expressions of InterestThe City of Davis issues a Request for Expressions of Interest for a private-sector innovation park. Three firms respond; two eventually drop out. The Ramco/Buzz Oates consortium begins planning what will become DISC. Davisite: https://davisite.org/2020/10/17/lwv-davis-area-pros-and-cons-for-measure-b/
November 3, 2020Measure B Fails — DISC Rejected First Time (52-48%)Davis voters reject Measure B — the first version of the Davis Innovation & Sustainability Campus — by approximately 52-48%, a margin of ~1,269 votes. The 2020 proposal was for 187 acres east of Mace Boulevard. Opponents focused on traffic on Mace Boulevard and the car-dependence of the campus design. Note: many UC Davis students were absent from Davis during COVID, suppressing turnout among the demographic most supportive of the project. The Aggie: https://theaggie.org/2021/01/11/davis-measure-b-failed-by-1269-votes-last-november
November 3, 2020Measure D Passes — Measure J/R/D Renewed for Another Decade (83-17%)On the same ballot as the DISC defeat, Davis voters renew Measure J/R/D for another decade by an 83-17% margin. This decisive vote to keep the voter-approval requirement signals that the growth control mechanism itself has overwhelming support independent of any individual project. Davis Vanguard: https://davisvanguard.org/2020/11/analysis-not-a-huge-amount-of-surprises-locally/
July 1, 2021Developers Return With DiSC 2022 — Revised, Smaller, More HousingRamco Enterprises and Buzz Oates (without Reynolds & Brown, who withdrew) submit a revised application. DiSC 2022 is reduced from 187 acres to 118 acres, traffic is cut by 55%, housing is increased to 460 units (74+ affordable), and a carbon neutrality target of 2040 is added. The developers believe the improvements will address the concerns that killed Measure B. Davis Enterprise: https://www.davisenterprise.com/news/slimmed-down-disc-proposal-likely-headed-back-to-ballot/
February 1, 2022City Council Approves DiSC 2022 and Places Measure H on June BallotThe Davis City Council approves the DiSC 2022 proposal and votes to place it on the June 7, 2022 primary ballot as Measure H. Councilmember Dan Carson and Mayor Gloria Partida lead the council majority in support. Davis Vanguard: https://davisvanguard.org/2022/02/davis-city-council-votes-to-include-disc-2022-on-june-ballot-public-expresses-support/
April 1, 2022Councilmember Carson Files Lawsuit Against No on H Ballot LanguageCouncilmember Dan Carson files a writ petition in Yolo Superior Court seeking changes to the ballot argument submitted by the No on H campaign, arguing certain statements are false or misleading. A judge orders two minor changes but leaves the bulk of opponents' arguments intact. Former Davis Mayor Ann Evans writes: "Dan Carson has set a low bar for conduct of an elected official in Davis." Analysts credit the lawsuit as a significant factor in the 2022 defeat being wider than 2020. The Aggie: https://theaggie.org/2022/04/15/lawsuit-filed-to-change-misleading-ballot-statements-written-by-opponents-of-the-disc-2022-development-project/
June 7, 2022Measure H Fails — DiSC 2022 Rejected 63.5-36.5%Davis voters reject Measure H — DiSC 2022 — by 63.5% to 36.5%. Out of approximately 11,166 votes cast, the NO margin is approximately 3,000 votes. The defeat is significantly worse than the 2020 result despite a smaller project and more housing. The Davis Vanguard: "Despite being a smaller project with a seemingly more favorable environment than in 2020, DiSC has apparently gone down to an overwhelming loss." Analysts attribute the worse result partly to backlash from Carson's ballot argument lawsuit and partly to the Yes campaign's messaging. Davis Vanguard: https://davisvanguard.org/2022/06/measure-h-goes-down-to-resounding-loss/
January 1, 2024Developers Do Not Return — Project Definitively DeadAfter the 63.5-36.5% defeat of Measure H in June 2022, Ramco Enterprises and Buzz Oates do not submit a third application for the Mace Boulevard/I-80 site. The site remains in agricultural production. The 460 housing units DiSC 2022 would have contributed to Davis's housing stock were never built. Davis begins preliminary discussions about amending Measure J/R/D, prompted by HCD pressure. Davis Vanguard: https://davisvanguard.org/2022/08/my-view-the-recent-history-of-housing-in-davis-is-not-all-that-robust/

Decisions

No decision records yet. Decision records are added from minutes, agenda packets, video, or rulings.

Sources

  1. Davis Measure B Failed by 1269 Votes Last November, The Aggie (UC Davis), January 11, 2021 [News Article]. https://theaggie.org/2021/01/11/davis-measure-b-failed-by-1269-votes-last-november Post-election analysis of Measure B (2020) defeat. Confirms ~52-48% result. Contains Alan Pryor quote on car trips. Good source for 2020 context.
  2. Slimmed-Down DISC Proposal Likely Headed Back to Ballot, Davis Enterprise, July 9, 2021 [News Article]. https://www.davisenterprise.com/news/slimmed-down-disc-proposal-likely-headed-back-to-ballot/ Coverage of Ramco/Buzz Oates 2021 resubmission. Confirms Reynolds & Brown dropped out. Contains Dan Ramos quote. Best source for explaining changes between 2020 and 2022 proposals.
  3. Lawsuit Filed to Change Misleading Ballot Statements Written by Opponents of DiSC 2022, The Aggie, April 15, 2022 [News Article]. https://theaggie.org/2022/04/15/lawsuit-filed-to-change-misleading-ballot-statements-written-by-opponents-of-the-disc-2022-development-project/ Coverage of Carson's ballot argument lawsuit. Confirms judge ordered two changes, left bulk of No arguments intact. Best source for the lawsuit controversy.
  4. Yolo County Elections: Measure H Results (June 7, 2022), Yolo County Elections, June 7, 2022 [Planning Document]. https://electionstats.elections.yolocounty.gov/contest/69 Official results page for Measure H, June 7, 2022 Primary Election. Primary government source for confirming final vote totals.
  5. Measure H Goes Down to Resounding Loss, Davis Vanguard (David Greenwald), June 8, 2022 [News Article]. https://davisvanguard.org/2022/06/measure-h-goes-down-to-resounding-loss/ Night-of reporting on the Measure H defeat. Confirms 63.5% NO, 36.5% YES, ~3,000 vote margin, ~11,166 votes cast. Best primary source for final vote count and developer/council reaction.
  6. My View: The Recent History of Housing in Davis Is Not All That Robust, Davis Vanguard, August 21, 2022 [News Article]. https://davisvanguard.org/2022/08/my-view-the-recent-history-of-housing-in-davis-is-not-all-that-robust/ Best post-mortem on Davis housing production failures including DiSC. Contains "zero units of housing have materialized from Measure J/R/D projects" as of 2022.
  7. Analysis: What Happens If We Don't Build the Housing, Davis Vanguard, April 27, 2026 [News Article]. https://davisvanguard.org/2026/04/measure-j-housing-risk/ April 2026 analysis of Davis housing situation. Confirms DiSC site remains farmland. Best source for current status and state pressure on Davis to amend its growth control ordinance.

Data quality

Rating 3 of 5. Multiple sources, including at least one primary record. Corrections: https://whokilledthebuilding.com/corrections.