Woodside SB 9 Housing Program — The Mountain Lion Moratorium

Ask a question to begin.

California's SB 9 takes effect on January 1, 2022, allowing homeowners in single-family zones to split lots and build up to four residential units. Woodside immediately begins the process of minimizing its impact.

The Woodside Town Council passes an ordinance implementing SB 9 with the most restrictive possible conditions: all SB 9 units are capped at 800 square feet (vs. the state default of up to 1,200 sq ft); basements are banned; areas at high wildfire risk are excluded. In a market where construction costs are $500-$700 per square foot, an 800 sq ft unit may be financially infeasible for most homeowners. The ordinance achieves de facto blockage of most SB 9 development without invoking the mountain lion.

At the January 25, 2022 Town Council meeting, the mountain lion habitat exemption is raised as a potential way to block SB 9 entirely. The council does not formally vote but allows Planning Director Jackie Young to proceed with studying and implementing the exemption. All SB 9 applications are placed on indefinite hold.

Town Planning Director Jackie Young issues an official memo declaring the entire incorporated Town of Woodside a mountain lion habitat, citing the SB 9 species protection exemption. The memo states: "Mountain lions are a protected species because they are a candidate for the California Endangered Species Act and Woodside, in its entirety, is a mountain lion habitat." All SB 9 applications are frozen indefinitely. Town Manager Kevin Bryant confirms the hold.

The Almanac publishes the first news article about the Woodside mountain lion freeze. Within days the story is covered by the New York Times, Washington Post, NBC News, BBC, NPR, The Guardian, and The Atlantic. Woodside becomes a global symbol of housing obstruction. A BBC anchor says the story "really doesn't sound like it's real."

California Attorney General Rob Bonta issues a letter to Woodside on a Sunday. Key findings: (1) an entire town cannot be declared habitat for a protected species; (2) land that is already developed is not, by definition, habitat; (3) the species protection exemption requires parcel-by-parcel analysis with substantial evidence. AG Bonta: "Woodside declared its entire suburban town a mountain lion sanctuary in a deliberate and transparent attempt to avoid complying with SB 9." Californians for Homeownership is simultaneously preparing a lawsuit.

Hours after AG Bonta's Sunday memo, the Woodside Town Council holds a closed session emergency meeting. The council discusses both the AG's letter and the imminent Californians for Homeownership lawsuit. The council directs staff to reverse the moratorium effective the following morning.

Deputy Town Attorney Kai Ruess announces that beginning February 7, all SB 9 applications will be accepted. "The Department of Fish and Wildlife advised that the entire Town of Woodside cannot be considered habitat. As such, the Town Council has directed staff to immediately begin accepting SB 9 applications." Duration of the mountain lion moratorium: 13 days. Applications received during the moratorium: zero. The 800 sq ft unit cap remains in effect.

No SB 9 applications have been received even after the reversal. Resident Bob Wilson calls for investigations into Planning Director Young and Town Manager Bryant for mishandling SB 9 and subjecting the town to "embarrassment and humiliation." A Planning Commission member raises declining Woodside Elementary School enrollment as a sign of the town's housing problem: "We've seen declining enrollment; there's empty classrooms at this point."

The Woodside Town Council adopts its 6th Cycle (2023-2031) Housing Element, planning for 328 units. Two days later, HCD writes confirming the element meets the statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law but cannot be found in substantial compliance until required rezonings are completed. Until then, Woodside faces potential fines of $10,000/month and possible loss of local land use control.

"Woodside declared its entire suburban town a mountain lion sanctuary in a deliberate and transparent attempt to avoid complying with SB 9." "An entire town cannot be declared habitat for a protected species." "Land that is already developed — with, for example, a single-family home — is not, by definition, habitat; and any exemption under SB 9 requires the town to examine the attributes of an individual parcel of land." (AG letter, February 6, 2022)

Was preparing a lawsuit against Woodside when the town reversed course. Their threatened litigation was the immediate proximate cause of the emergency council session and reversal. Had previously won a Housing Accountability Act lawsuit against Huntington Beach over a denied condominium project (2021).

Allowed the mountain lion freeze at the January 25, 2022 council meeting without a formal vote. Passed a restrictive 800 sq ft cap on SB 9 units (January 11, 2022). Reversed under combined pressure of the AG memo and threatened lawsuit from Californians for Homeownership. The combination of the 800 sq ft cap and the mountain lion gambit represents the broadest possible effort to neutralize a state housing law short of outright non-compliance.

Planning Director Jackie Young issued a memo on January 27, 2022 declaring the entire Town of Woodside a mountain lion habitat under the species protection exemption in SB 9, freezing all housing applications. AG Bonta issued a rebuttal on February 6, 2022: "An entire town cannot be declared habitat for a protected species." The town reversed course February 7, 2022 — 13 days after the memo. This mechanism is notable not for its duration (13 days) or measurable impact (zero applications demonstrably delayed) but for what it reveals about the intent behind housing obstruction: the willingness of a wealthy suburb to invoke any available legal mechanism — however implausible — to avoid housing law compliance. Every other case in this database uses procedural cover. Woodside used a mountain lion.

On January 11, 2022, the Woodside Town Council passed a local SB 9 ordinance capping all SB 9 units at 800 square feet, banning basements, and excluding wildfire-risk areas. In a market where construction costs are $500-$700+ per square foot, an 800 sq ft unit would cost $400,000-$560,000 to build before land acquisition — making it economically infeasible for most homeowners. The 800 sq ft cap may achieve what the mountain lion failed to: making SB 9 development in Woodside effectively impossible regardless of legal eligibility. As of February 2022 and through the research date, zero SB 9 applications had been filed.

Official town FAQ confirming RHNA 6th Cycle = 328 units; Housing Element adopted July 23, 2024; HCD confirmed it meets statutory requirements but awaits rezoning for full compliance. Confirms prior cycle (62 units) vs. current obligation (328 units).

Post-mortem. Contains Bob Wilson's embarrassment and humiliation letter. Confirms zero SB 9 applications received after reversal. Contains declining Woodside Elementary enrollment data.

Best source for the reversal announcement. Contains Kai Ruess full statement. Confirms Fish and Wildlife guidance received and immediate acceptance of SB 9 applications. Also notes 800 sq ft cap still in effect.

Confirms the cause-and-effect chain: AG memo Sunday → emergency closed session Sunday evening → reversal announcement Monday morning. Best source for the emergency meeting sequence.

AG Bonta's Sunday letter. Contains all three key legal arguments: entire town cannot be declared habitat; developed land is not habitat; exemption requires parcel-by-parcel analysis. Contains the "deliberate and transparent attempt" characterization. Primary government source.

First report breaking the mountain lion story. Confirms January 27 memo from Jackie Young, January 25 council meeting, and January 11 ordinance (800 sq ft cap). Best primary source for the initial freeze and its basis.