Early warning

Decisions coming up

These are pending decisions on California housing projects that show signs of obstruction, drawn from public agendas, notices, and reporting, each with a linked source. Dates come from the public record and can move; the source link is the authority.

RSS feedJSON21 decisions pending
Region
Decision body

Willowgrove (Davis Measure W)

Davis · Yolo County · 1,250 units
Measure J/R/D citywide vote · Davis voters
November 3, 2026 (in 12 days)

Davis Eastside's 1,250-home Willowgrove project on 232 acres north of East Covell Boulevard needs a citywide vote under the city's Measure J requirement. Five months earlier voters rejected Village Farms by 276 votes.

SourceDavis profile

Newport Beach Measure H (Responsible Housing Initiative)

Newport Beach · Orange County
Ballot measure · Newport Beach voters
November 3, 2026 (in 12 days)
Downzoning proposed

Measure H would replace the state-approved housing plan (8,174 units of zoned capacity) with one allowing about 2,900. Backed by SPON and the Newport Beach Stewardship Association; their appeal of the 2025 ruling that the council could adopt the housing element without a Greenlight vote is pending in the Fourth District.

Source 1Source 2Documented caseNewport Beach profile

505 East Los Olivos Street (The Mission LLC)

Santa Barbara · Santa Barbara County · 270 units · 54 affordable
Motion for judgment on the pleadings · Santa Barbara Superior Court, Dept. 3
November 4, 2026 (in 13 days)
Builder's remedy applicationCEQA suit filed

Eight-story builder's remedy project behind the Old Mission. The writ claims were denied April 22, 2026; the city's motion on the remaining declaratory relief claim was continued to Nov 4. The city says full CEQA review is required before any hearing. A federal suit over SB 158 was dismissed with leave to amend in June 2026.

Source 1Source 2Documented caseSanta Barbara profile

Brisbane Baylands Specific Plan

Brisbane · San Mateo County · 2,200 units
Specific Plan adoption and EIR certification · Brisbane City Council
November 9, 2026 (in 18 days)
Housing element out of complianceContinued repeatedly

Council hearings on the 660-acre Baylands plan continue Oct 20, with Oct 26 and Nov 9 set tentatively; the hearing may close Nov 9 ahead of a vote. HCD revoked Brisbane's housing element compliance in a June 30, 2026 letter after the city missed its May 18 rezoning deadline, so the builder's remedy now applies.

Source 1Source 2Documented caseBrisbane profile

San Francisco Family Zoning Plan lawsuits

San Francisco · San Francisco County
First merits hearing (pro-housing suit) · San Francisco Superior Court
November 18, 2026 (in 27 days)
CEQA suit filed

Two suits over the citywide rezoning approved in December 2025: a CEQA challenge from Neighborhoods United SF and others seeking to undo it, and a suit from YIMBY Law and the California Housing Defense Fund arguing it falls short of the housing element and limits state density bonus tools. First merits hearing in the second case is Nov 18.

SourceDocumented caseSan Francisco profile

156 California Avenue (Mollie Stone's site)

Palo Alto · Santa Clara County · 390 units · 50 affordable
Approval of negotiated project · Palo Alto City Council
Date not yet set
Builder's remedy application

On May 18, 2026 the council voted 4-2 to pursue a negotiated version: 390 units (50 affordable) in towers up to 14 stories, down from the 17-story builder's remedy filing, which stays on file as a fallback. Architectural review, then a council vote later in 2026.

Source 1Source 2Documented casePalo Alto profile

294-296 Tyrella Avenue

Mountain View · Santa Clara County · 80 units
Neighbor suit · Santa Clara County Superior Court
Date not yet set
Builder's remedy applicationCEQA suit filed

The council approved the seven-story, 80-unit builder's remedy project on April 8, 2025. Neighbors sued in May 2025 over CEQA, seismic study and the affordable unit mix; no ruling or construction reported.

SourceDocumented caseMountain View profile

Midway Rising (Sports Arena site)

San Diego · San Diego County · 4,254 units · 2,000 affordable
Disposition and Development Agreement and Subsequent EIR certification · San Diego City Council
Date not yet set
CEQA suit filed

The City Council's Land Use and Housing Committee was scheduled to take up the Disposition and Development Agreement for 4,254 apartments, at least 2,000 of them affordable, on Oct. 16, 2026, with the full council expected to vote in November and the negotiating agreement expiring Dec. 4, 2026. Save Our Access, whose CEQA suits twice overturned voter-approved measures lifting the height limit for the project, says it will keep looking for ways to push back.

Source 1Source 2Source 3Source 4Documented caseSan Diego profile

Los Gatos builder's remedy applications

Los Gatos · Santa Clara County · 295 units · 59 affordable
Final judgment and possible appeal · Santa Clara County Superior Court
Date not yet set
Builder's remedy applicationApplication completeness dispute

The town sued its own applicants claiming their applications had expired. On Jan 29, 2026 Judge Helen Williams ruled for the developers, holding that each resubmittal restarts the 90-day window; in April the council granted the Luxe and Arya appeals. The town may appeal once judgment is final. Capri (119 units) is a separate pending claim.

SourceDocumented caseLos Gatos profile

Santa Cruz County builder's remedy projects

Santa Cruz County (Live Oak) · Santa Cruz County · 162 units · 10 affordable
Deemed-approved and neighbor suits · Santa Cruz County Superior Court
Date not yet set
Builder's remedy applicationContinued repeatedly

The Planning Commission continued 3500 Paul Sweet Road (105 units) in January 2026; the developer then sued claiming it is approved by operation of law. Neighbors sued over the 57-unit 841 Capitola Road approval. The county asked HCD to backdate its housing element certification; no response reported.

Source 1Source 2Documented caseSanta Cruz County (Live Oak) profile

Lot T, 450 Lytton Avenue

Palo Alto · Santa Clara County · 72 units · 72 affordable
Development agreement · Palo Alto City Council
Date not yet set

Alta Housing filed its formal application in February 2026 for six stories and 72 affordable units on a city-owned parking lot. A lawsuit by the group Downtown Vibrancy produced an August 2026 ruling that local coverage described as boosting the city's effort. Council action on the development agreement has no date; construction would start in 2028 at the earliest.

Source 1Source 2Documented casePalo Alto profile

Seaside Ridge, North Bluff

Del Mar · San Diego County · 259 units · 85 affordable
North Bluff rezoning and refiled suit · Del Mar City Council; San Diego Superior Court
Date not yet set
Builder's remedy application

The Fairgrounds board ended talks on Del Mar's fallback affordable site on Aug 18, 2026, which under the housing element triggers rezoning of North Bluff, the Seaside Ridge site. HCD had set a November 2026 deadline for the Fairgrounds lease. The developer's refiled suit is pending.

Source 1Source 2Documented caseDel Mar profile

Anderson Ranch

Danville · Contra Costa County · 38 units
Easement case · Contra Costa County Superior Court
Date not yet set
Builder's remedy applicationApplication completeness dispute

A judge ruled in July 2025 that Danville violated state law by deeming the application incomplete. The remaining fight is the owner's suit against the neighborhood HOA over the access easement; town staff say site studies cannot proceed until it resolves.

SourceDocumented caseDanville profile

Scofield Drive and Vista Heights

Cupertino · Santa Clara County · 50 units · 10 affordable
Petitions over expired applications · Santa Clara County Superior Court
Date not yet set
Builder's remedy applicationApplication completeness dispute

YIMBY Law and the California Housing Defense Fund sued in April 2025 after the city declared two builder's remedy applications expired. HCD issued a notice of violation in July 2025, and the Los Gatos ruling in January 2026 rejected the same legal theory. No Cupertino ruling reported.

SourceDocumented caseCupertino profile

Suisun City expansion (California Forever)

Suisun City · Solano County · 173,913 units
Annexation and EIR · Suisun City Council, then Solano LAFCO
Date not yet set

Suisun City accepted the 22,900-acre annexation application in October 2025. The city says EIR studies finish in fall 2026, followed by public comment and a council vote; no draft EIR has been released. The Nov 3, 2026 mayoral race is being run partly on the project.

Source 1Source 2Documented caseSuisun City profile

Huntington Beach housing element enforcement

Huntington Beach · Orange County · 13,368 units
Rezoning compliance and penalties · San Diego Superior Court
Date not yet set
Housing element out of complianceBuilder's remedy application

The court imposed $160,000 in penalties plus $50,000 a month from June 2026. The council adopted a housing element June 16 and had 120 days, to about Oct 14, to adopt the implementing zoning; the Attorney General has asked for up to $100,000 a month. Fines can triple, and the court can appoint a receiver if noncompliance continues.

Source 1Source 2Documented caseHuntington Beach profile

4224 Jefferson Avenue

Woodside · San Mateo County · 105 units · 21 affordable
Completeness determination · Town of Woodside planning staff
Date not yet set
Builder's remedy applicationApplication completeness dispute

The town has found the 16-story builder's remedy application incomplete four times (July, November and December 2025, April 2026) and says no hearing is required. Sewer capacity is the main issue. The developer disputes the findings and has warned of legal fees.

SourceDocumented caseWoodside profile

One Redondo (AES power plant site)

Redondo Beach · Los Angeles County · 2,700 units
Five pending suits · Los Angeles County Superior Court
Date not yet set
Builder's remedy application

The appeals court invalidated Redondo Beach's housing element in October 2025; the city adopted a new one that HCD certified in May 2026. The developer settled one of six suits against the city in March 2026; five remain.

Source 1Source 2Documented caseRedondo Beach profile

Silver Oaks Senior Housing

Los Altos Hills · Santa Clara County · 62 units
Challenge to denial · Santa Clara County Superior Court
Date not yet set

The council denied the 62-unit senior project on June 18, 2025, citing fire and evacuation risk. The California Housing Defense Fund and the owner sued Sept 15, 2025 under the Housing Accountability Act; no ruling reported.

SourceDocumented caseLos Altos Hills profile

80 Willow Road (former Sunset campus)

Menlo Park · San Mateo County · 665 units
Developer suit over delay · San Mateo County Superior Court
Date not yet set
Builder's remedy applicationApplication completeness dispute

Builder's remedy towers on the former Sunset Magazine campus. The developer sued Oct 2, 2026 alleging the city illegally delayed approval; on Oct 13 the council hired Goldfarb & Lipman to defend. The city found the project ineligible for AB 2011 streamlining and disputes its builder's remedy eligibility.

Source 1Source 2Documented caseMenlo Park profile

Costa Mesa housing element

Costa Mesa · Orange County · 11,760 units
Housing element adoption · Costa Mesa City Council; Orange County Superior Court
Date not yet set
Housing element out of compliance

The state sued July 16, 2026 seeking a compliant housing element and rezoning within 120 days. HCD said in August the city's proposed revisions would suffice once adopted; on Sept 15 the council capped the Fairview site at 2,300 units. Formal adoption and certification are pending.

Source 1Source 2Documented caseCosta Mesa profile

Recent outcomes

Decisions recorded in the last 30 days.

No outcomes recorded in the last 30 days.

Back to the database